Add "No Disney Villains" and "Risk Versus Consequence"

diff --git a/climbing.md b/climbing.md
index d65c168..6c66736 100644 (file)
--- a/climbing.md
+++ b/climbing.md
@@ -16,5 +16,8 @@ strengthening these muscles does contribute to climbing in many cases.
 # Tactics
 * [Projecting](projecting)
 
+# Head game
+* [Risk versus consequence](risk-versus-consequence)
+
 # Other
 [DOMS](delayed-onset-muscle-soreness)

diff --git a/no-disney-villains.md b/no-disney-villains.md
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..ea5317f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/no-disney-villains.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+There are no Disney villains.
+
+In this essay, when I say "Disney villain", I mean the archetypical villain
+from older Disney movies, where the villain is just bad for no reason. Disney
+villains have no motivation, not even personal gain: they merely are evil for
+evil's sake.
+
+The idea of a Disney villain is attractive because it's simple. There's no
+ethical quandary with a Disney villain: while not every villain in older Disney
+movies actually dies, the stakes are similar: it's kill or be killed. There's
+no ethical debate about whether it's wrong to kill a Disney villain, because
+there's no other option. They're the bad guys, and if the good guys pull any
+punches, *the bad guys win*. We don't want that, do we?
+
+While Disney villains are fine as a plot device in movies, the problem arises
+when we begin to treat people as Disney villains in real life. People in real
+life do bad things, but they aren't Disney villains. There are the occasional
+mentally ill people who are internally compelled to do things even they believe
+are bad. But in most cases, people who do bad things do those bad things because
+they believe what they believe those bad things are good things. Good
+intentions are easily perverted by fear or ignorance.

diff --git a/risk-versus-consequence.md b/risk-versus-consequence.md
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c3e6d03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/risk-versus-consequence.md
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+When talking about dangerous rock climbing situations, it's useful to consider
+two different factors: *risk* and *consequence*.  *Risk* is the probability that
+something bad happens, while *consequence* answers the question "how bad is it?"
+when it happens.

diff --git a/works-in-progress.md b/works-in-progress.md
index 703e18c..93ad3af 100644 (file)
--- a/works-in-progress.md
+++ b/works-in-progress.md
@@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
 # Works in Progress
+* [Risk versus consequence](risk-versus-consequence)
+* [There Are No Disney Villains](no-disney-villains)
 
 # To-do
 * [Advertising Considered Harmful](advertising-considered-harmful)
+* [Agency](agency)